The title of
this article may sound like the Ten
Commandments of life coaching but this is how the Italian director Uberto
Pasolini feels about life right now. Indeed, for him, – and for most of us -
life and how we live it is important. He
shared his preoccupations on that delicate matter in his new poignant and meditative
film: Still Life.
Uberto Pasolini is famous for producing the
award-winning film The Full Monty among
others and he is back with his latest feature film, the above mentioned Still Life, that had its premiere and
first festival bow at this year’s Venice Film Festival where it screened in the
Orizzonti section and snatched the Orizzonti Award for Best Director. Now,
his new work opened the Warsaw Film Festival.
Still
Life follows John May, a
London funeral officer who arranges funerals for those who lived and died alone
and attends them so that these people do not go alone to the afterlife.
Still
Life is the product of a
blend of Pasolini’s own life and an article he read in an English newspaper and
more precisely, an interview with a woman who did this particular job for the
Westminster Council borough. In fact, as Pasolini recounted, he started
following another two funeral officers in Lewisham and Southwark, in South
London. He discovered that the general state of the matter is a most
unfortunate preponderance of either non-located relatives or ones that “have no interest in being there or
participating in any way in the funeral of the person in question”. After
attending as well a reunion of all the funeral officers of greater London, an
assembly of thirty people, the director found out that the majority of them organize
ceremonies but are, however, not present due to their own busy lives or to the
fact that they perform their jobs in a highly bureaucratic and rather inhuman
way. Pasolini admitted being very much struck by the “idea of people who have been forgotten at the end of their lives and
are even forgotten at the last moment they spend on Earth”.
In fact, the image of a lonely grave – an
image we see at the end of the film – prompted him to envisage making a film on
this subject. It started as an examination of a social phenomenon, that of isolation
in the metropolis of the Western world (but also in smaller cities), especially
surrounding the section of the population who might have difficulties in
connecting with their peers and who for that reason create relationships
through the internet which are, to his mind, not real, “give and take” relationships. Deeming his life truly lucky and
privileged, he became interested in lives different than his own and with them,
he discovered an entirely different world. It became, however, much more
personal as it came to be an analysis of “what
it meant to be alone and to be lonely”. As he talked about loneliness,
Pasolini expressed with certain sadness that he has felt it in the last few
years of his life as he is divorced from his wife, Rachel Mary Berkeley
Portman, the composer if his films, with his children living between the two
parents “… you open the door and it’s all
dark and there are no noises and no smells, and no nothing, no life”. And
sadly, indeed, he has felt the loneliness of these moments and tried to imagine
what it meant for them to be the constant in one’s life.
In that sense, Still Life also underlines the director’s attachment to the
importance of his being more interested in other people’s lives, not just those
of his family and the people he comes daily in contact with but also of those
of people who he would not normally want to meet or talk to, whether it is his
neighbor, whom he, for instance, did not know before he made this film or even
the mere possibility of having coffee in a bar in the morning and have “just
that exchange and interest in somebody’s life [that] makes one richer”. Pasolini’s message to today’s younger
generations is one about the significance of openness to other people coming
into their lives, of remaining open to contact in order to avoid meeting the
fate of some of his characters.
Moreover, the predominance of the color blue
as well as desaturated colors at the beginning of the film translate in a way
the “blues” the director is feeling at this stage of his life, his feelings and
preoccupations about life’s emptiness without people in it and
loneliness. He confesses the protagonist was created after his own persona, “it’s me unfortunately, that’s what I’m like…
picking up crumbs and putting them back in the coffee…. I eat tuna like that…”.
The comic relief in Still Life comes
from the repetition and the routine as well as the reality and truthfulness of
the premise and the construction of the narrative, a “piece of comedy that when it’s real, it feels truthful”. If one
lives alone like he does, “you do the
same thing, you walk in through your front door when coming back from work or
somewhere and you hang your coat always on the same peg”. The repetition to
him is a completely natural component of life: “it’s how we live, how we function especially when we don’t have people
to interfere with our lives…”.
What Pasolini wishes to show with Still Life is that life does not end
with death.
And the title of his film, in spite of
its ambiguous nature, is the perfect definition of the director’s message: “it’s Still Life because it is a life that is
not moving, it’s Still Life because it’s still a life despite the fact that
it’s not moving, it’s a still life because it’s a life made of stills,
photographs. You can read it in different ways”. To him, the need to engage
with other people and remain alive by doing so is crucial as well as
recognizing other people’s lives “which
is what the central character does, what he wants to do when he collects those
things in people’s apartments to write eulogies, is remembering the world which
is not listening that this person had a life and that life has to be recognized
before it’s forgotten forever”.
In addition, Pasolini stresses that John
May is not a sad about his own loneliness, that he does not feel lonely. He is
just solitary. And it is important that we do not feel pity for him, nor judge
him and in this regard, “it is still a
life and we shouldn’t judge anybody’s life”. Pasolini advises us to “recognize other people’s lives and don’t
judge them too much” and to be “good
at [ours]”, an advice I am most inclined to take seriously and follow
thoroughly. And we should all. Thank you, Pasolini…
Brak komentarzy:
Prześlij komentarz